CASE STUDY: INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS – IN-PERSON AND REMOTE
The Lesser Known Nuances of Privilege, Evidence Gathering, Witness Interviews, and Corporate Communications: Real-World Examples of Successes and Missteps
Jeppe Kromann Haarsted
Group Compliance Manager
FLSmidth (Denmark)
Thomas Markus Etter
Compliance and Corporate Responsibility Director
Hempel A/S (Denmark)
Thomas Skou Roer
Assistant Professor, External Lecturer in Forensic Psychology
University College Copenhagen (Denmark)
Tormod Tingstad
Advokat, Head of Investigations
Gorrissen Federspiel (Denmark)
Gareth Rees QC
Partner
Morrison & Foerster LLP (United Kingdom)
- Communication is everything: How to approach and inform your organization of an investigation into suspicious conduct
- Mapping suppliers, customers and third parties: Tackling the most common objections from business partners to cooperate in an investigation
- The role of forensic data analysis and AI in identifying which information is most germane to an investigation
- Data privacy considerations: How to resolve the trickiest issues in light of tightened international data protection and data sharing legislation
- The scope of privilege across the Nordics relating to interviews during an internal investigation, notes and memoranda
- The significance of U.S. v. Connolly in the Nordics region: New considerations for handling internal investigations
- How the increasing use of social media and messaging apps has affected the course of internal investigations
- When multi-jurisdictional bribery enforcement could spark investigations into other crimes, including fraud, money laundering and privacy violations-and vice versa
- The impact of multi-jurisdictional enforcement risks on your decision to disclose or cooperate