CASE STUDY: INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS – IN-PERSON AND REMOTE

The Lesser Known Nuances of Privilege, Evidence Gathering, Witness Interviews, and Corporate Communications: Real-World Examples of Successes and Missteps

January 28, 2021 2:45pm

Jeppe Kromann Haarsted
Group Compliance Manager
FLSmidth (Denmark)

Thomas Markus Etter
Compliance and Corporate Responsibility Director
Hempel A/S (Denmark)

Thomas Skou Roer
Assistant Professor, External Lecturer in Forensic Psychology
University College Copenhagen (Denmark)

Tormod Tingstad
Advokat, Head of Investigations
Gorrissen Federspiel (Denmark)

Gareth Rees QC
Partner
Morrison & Foerster LLP (United Kingdom)

  • Communication is everything: How to approach and inform your organization of an investigation into suspicious conduct
  • Mapping suppliers, customers and third parties: Tackling the most common objections from business partners to cooperate in an investigation
  • The role of forensic data analysis and AI in identifying which information is most germane to an investigation
  • Data privacy considerations: How to resolve the trickiest issues in light of tightened international data protection and data sharing legislation
  • The scope of privilege across the Nordics relating to interviews during an internal investigation, notes and memoranda
  • The significance of U.S. v. Connolly in the Nordics region: New considerations for handling internal investigations
  • How the increasing use of social media and messaging apps has affected the course of internal investigations
  • When multi-jurisdictional bribery enforcement could spark investigations into other crimes, including fraud, money laundering and privacy violations-and vice versa
  • The impact of multi-jurisdictional enforcement risks on your decision to disclose or cooperate