19th C5 Forum on Biotech Patenting

19th C5 Forum on Biotech Patenting

Wednesday, October 06 to Thursday, October 07, 2010
Le Mèridien Piccadilly, London, England, United Kingdom

Pre-Conference Workshop: Tuesday, 5 OctobePre-Conference Workshop: Tuesday, 5 October 2010

2.00 – 5.00 (Registration From 1:30)

Drating Successful Patent Applications for Biotechnology-Related Inventions

Adrian Bradley, Partner, Cleveland (UK)

Ian Bryan, IP Counsel, GE Healthcare (UK)

Thomas Kowalski, Partner, Frommer, Lawrence & Haug (US)

The drafting of patent applications covering biotechnology related inventions such as research tools, pharmaceuticals, genomics, proteomics and diagnostics is becoming increasingly complex. Moreover, the rapidly evolving science and technology makes it imprudent to rely upon yesterday’s ‘tried and true’ drafting methods.

The workshop leaders will walk you through the process of drafting complex claims and specifications. Get the tools you need to draft applications that will withstand future challenges.

• What the examiners are looking for
• What you should include – and avoid – in drafting a successful patent application in light of evolving case law
• How to address European and Federal Circuit case law in your application proactively
• When to file broad and when to file narrow claims
• Whether claims of differing scope should be filed in the same or separate applications – impact of new EPO limitations on divisional applications
• Claim categories: How to ensure a broad scope of protection (purpose-limited / Swiss claims, national requirements, dosage regimens)
• Preparing in advance for search limitations – impact of new EPO practice
• Enablement and written description – anticipating and defending against attacks arising from changing requirements
• What are we to do about biological products (nucleic acids, proteins, antibodies) that at the time of filing, can only be described functionally and not structurally?
• What to consider when claiming diagnostic methods in view of recent Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions
• How can Bilski affect claim drafting for biotechnological inventions in the US?

The workshop will also cover issues that should be considered when drafting claims in the context of litigating or licensing biotechnology patent claims including:

• Consideration of claim language – how to permit the patentee to meet the burden of proving infringement without unnecessary difficulty
• Products and processes – do claims cover those products or processes that will be commercialised?
• Doctrine of equivalents – how to determine infringement, how to build the basis for an enlarged scope of protection